Snoring is a very common problem that almost every third person has but there is not much that you can do about snoring. Lots of people believe that there is absolutely no solution for snoring but there are some home remedies for snoring that you can apply. First of all you need to diagnose the proper cause of snoring. It can be due to allergy or any other kind of medical problem and you can consult your doctor for solving that medical problem. Sometimes it happens due to improper sleeping position because lots of people sleep with their belly down on the bed or they sleep on side shoulder. This position can be changes by sleeping straight and it can help in most of the cases. People that breathe through nose normally do not snore while people who are used to breathe through their mouth often get into the problem of snoring. You can practice to breathe through your nose during the day and it will automatically work at night as well. Try to be as comfortable as you can by adjusting the pillow under your neck. These are few things that you can try to prevent snoring and make your sleep more smooth.
Easy Remedies For Snoring
Snoring can be a very tough thing to control because a person that snored normally does not know about it and that is the reason, people cannot control it but still there are some easy remedies for snoring that you can try and these remedies will help you to reduce snoring to a minimum level. If you take sleeping pills then you should try to limit that usage. Do not take these pills on daily basis because most of these sleeping pills make your snoring worse by over relaxing your muscles. If you are taking one sleeping pill everyday then try to take half of the pill every day and you will surely see some difference in level of snoring. If you are used to sleep late then try to sleep early because at times snoring happens when you are too tired. Sleeping early will keep you relaxed and snoring will decrease. Being overweight also causes snoring at times and if you think that you have put on some extra weight then you can try to lose that weight and it will surely help. These are just home remedies or you can say that you just need to change you style of living a bit and snoring will decrease eventually.
Snoring can disturb your partner’s sleep and lots of people get very disturbed with another person’s snoring. Although the person that snores does not the feel the effects of it but the person lying next to him surely does. There are some very easy things that you can do and these remedies for snoring can help you to minimize the snoring. There are different causes for snoring in different people and most probably it happens due to lack of sleep, tiredness, allergy and other similar things. You can diagnose the actual cause and then rectify that cause to stop snoring. Although it is almost impossible to eradicate snoring completely but by doing some precautions you can keep it to a bearable level. If you are on sleeping pills then you need to try and minimize the usage of those pills because these pills can really make you snore very heavily. Your muscles get too relaxed and you start snoring beyond limits. Try and keep your sleep intact by sleeping early and getting up early. People with an unbalanced sleeping schedule also have more problems with snoring. Try sleeping in a comfortable position and adjust your neck properly to avoid any awkward position.
Snoring can be really irritating at times and especially when you are married and your partner does not snore then you can disturb her sleep a lot. People often think that they have no control over their snoring and they cannot limit of end the snoring. This is true to some extent but there are remedies for snoring that can help you to minimize snoring. Snoring always has a reason and that reason must be diagnosed properly. Some people snore because of extra fatigue on their muscles while others snore because of some allergy. To limit snoring you must know the exact cause and they try and rectify that cause with medicine or any other mean possible. Late sleeping can also cause snoring because extra burden on your body will make you tired. Being overweight is also a cause for snoring and if you are getting extra weight then you should do something about it as soon as possible and keep your weight on a manageable level. You can also consult your doctor and he will diagnose medical issues that can cause snoring but most of the times there are very minor causes. You should try changing your sleeping position to a more comfortable one and it will also help.
Imagine that the President calls a press conference to announce that a toxic substance is being pumped into the air. In just one year, it will kill at least 50,000 people and send four million children to their doctors. The substance contains the most potent poisons known, including 43-different carcinogens and thousands of other chemicals, such as cyanide, carbon monoxide, and strychnine.
It would be an environmental crisis: The American Medical Association, the National Academy of Sciences, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would all urge immediate action. Congress would quickly respond.
In fact, such a substance is being pumped into our air, and medical and scientific organizations have called for action to stop the hazard. Almost 90 percent of Americans regularly inhale the toxic mix and carry traces of it in their blood. It can even be detected in fetuses still in the womb.
However, Congress has not responded. The substance in question is the smoke from cigarettes – and it is the only highly toxic substance in this country that is explicitly exempted from consumer protection regulations and hazardous substance laws. And despite increasing evidence of the harm secondhand smoke can cause, it’s unlikely that Congress will take action to change the situation anytime soon.
“It’s extraordinary.” says Douglas Dockery of the Harvard School of Public Health. It makes no sense that we’d accept higher levels of pollution indoors than outdoors.”
How did we come to this? It began with the simple assumption, even by scientists, that secondhand smoke might be irritating, but not harmful because it’s so diluted by the air.
During the 1970′s and 1980′s, scientific data began to disprove that. When the actual amounts of smoke in the environment were measured, it was discovered that the amount taken into the lungs by those who don’t smoke was far higher than expected. Then researchers found that ounce for ounce, secondhand smoke is more hazardous than the kind inhaled directly by smokers. That’s because the smoke that comes off the end of a smoldering cigarette is created by lower-temperature burning than that inhaled by a smoker; this temperature difference creates a unique set of chemical reactions, leading to a compound that contains more carcinogens. In addition, a nonsmoker does not have the advantage of inhaling through a filter.
It took time for medical and scientific groups to establish the facts, and it was only in 1986 that the surgeon general cited secondhand smoke as a cause of lung cancer. Then in 1993, the EPA issued its definitive report, declaring secondhand smoke (also called environmental tobacco smoke) a Class A carcinogen – the most dangerous type.
To put this in perspective, the EPA commonly calls for regulations on a chemical when its risk of causing death exceeds one person in a million. With passive smoke, a person’s lifetime risk of lung cancer alone is one in 500. For someone exposed to unusually high amounts of smoke – for instance a waiter in a smoky restaurant – the risk rises to one in 50. The risk of getting heart disease because of secondhand smoke is even higher: one in 50 for a person with average exposure, as much as one in five for a person with the heaviest exposures over a lifetime.
Yet since the EPA’s 1993 report was issued, the tobacco industry has mounted a multimillion-dollar campaign to convince people that the hazards of secondhand smoke are far less than scientists and doctors think. And with a variety of misleading ads, they have largely succeeded.
In one ad, for example, R.J. Reynolds claimed that a nonsmoker working with smoking colleagues would inhale the equivalent of only one and a quarter cigarettes per month. That’s true, but only in terms of the nicotine that worker would inhale – one of the least hazardous compounds in cigarettes. One estimate of the actual hazard for that same office worker shows that he or she would take in per month as much benzene as someone who smoked six cigarettes, as much of the carcinogen 4ABP as in 17 cigarettes, and as much of the carcinogen NDMA as in 75 cigarettes.
Over the past ten years, tobacco companies have given an average of $12,000 to each of the members of the House of Representatives who serve on health committees and are in key leadership positions. And that figure does not include trips, parties, and other perks.
The money has clearly had an effect. There hasn’t been a major tobacco control bill passed since 1990, when smoking was banned on domestic airline flights. A bill to curb smoking in child-care centers on federal property was passed in 1993, but its reach is limited. because most child-care facilities are not located in federal buildings.
“There are some poisons that are more deadly than secondhand smoke, but nothing with the kind of wide exposure in the population,” says Jim Repace, an environmental scientist who is an expert on secondhand smoke. The only way to change things? “In the election booth,” says Repace. “This is a democracy, and if tobacco becomes an issue that drives votes, maybe politicians will begin to listen.”
Despite a setback from a couple of studies that dive-bombed beta-carotene’s place in the sun as an anti-lung cancer fix (the National Cancer Institute studies using beta-carotene on smokers resulted in a no-benefit-and-maybe-harm result, causing one of the studies to be interrupted), antioxidants are still being studied, as are several phytochemicals that appear to act as vitamin precursors. The beta-carotene study, while creating a flurry among U.S. researchers, developed into something much more serious in Scandinavia, where the Finnish alpha-tocopherol beta-carotene lung cancer prevention trial showed harm to smokers who were given supplemental beta-carotene.
Danish health minister Yvonne Anderson demanded a warning label on all supplements that include beta-carotene to warn smokers about possible harm. Denmark called on the European Union to review beta-carotene’s status as an approved food color additive, which could require its removal as the coloring material for margarine, candy, soda and other products.
Mary Burnette, spokesperson for the Council for Responsible Nutrition, the trade association for the U.S. dietary supplement industry, believes the Danish move was a “major overreaction.”
ABCs of vitamin E
Vitamin E is a potent peroxyl scavenger. It terminates the chain reaction of lipid peroxidation, according to studies completed at the University of California at Berkeley. Lester Packer is the principal investigator of the vitamin E group, along with Maret Traber. Their studies show that the antioxidant function of vitamin E is potentiated in the body by other antioxidants. The tocopheroxyl radical is reduced by ascorbate, which is then oxidized and can be reduced by thiol antioxidants such as glutathione and dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA), a hot button of its own.
How can we be sure of the efficacy of vitamin E? Until its function is more clearly understood, it will be difficult to determine precisely how the vitamin works, and to be sure that some of the effects aren’t negative. The use of vitamin E as a supplement or as an ingredient to fortify foods will remain controversial until the way the material works is clearly understood.
The vitamin E group at Berkeley is investigating the function of vitamin E by using alpha-lipoic acid, which has been shown in previous studies to prevent the development of vitamin E deficiency symptoms in laboratory animals. If vitamin E’s sole function is that of an antioxidant, alpha-lipoic acid should replace vitamin E in the studies. But if there are reactions between alpha-tocopherol and other nutrients indicating that vitamin E has a structure-specific role, the reaction could be defective. If tissue alpha-tocopherol concentrations are maintained in the presence of alpha-lipoic acid, then regeneration of vitamin E from the vitamin E radical is a relevant potentiator of the function of the vitamin.
Figuring out phytochemicals
According to a statement from the National Cancer Society, the group supports a total diet concept: A balanced diet that contains many different foods is necessary for good health. Still, the society states, some phytochemicals apparently do act to prevent cancer better than others. The NCS supports several studies on these food components, including a study of carotenoids related to vitamin A by Matthew Longnecker of the University of California at Los Angeles to measure certain dietary factors relating to cancer risk, and long-range studies by Walter Willett (Harvard’s School of Public Health) on dietary pattern and its relationship to heart disease and cancer.
Maybe because it’s been suggested that increased consumption of antioxidants can improve a person’s appearance and performance immediately, antioxidant compounds have gained a certain panache. The DSHEA (Dietary Supplements Health and Education Act) has permitted a number of sports drinks, sports bars, and other products to appear, chock-a-block with various compounds that are probably antioxidants. Some are herbal compounds that are very likely precursors to some of the antioxidant vitamins, and some are flavanoids, the secondary plant metabolites present in fruits and vegetables.
Just how effective are antioxidants in preventing cells from being damaged by free radicals? The studies aren’t really far enough along to tell. But clearly, increased consumption of fruits and vegetables, with carefully planned supplements, seems to be warranted. Consumption of vitamin C is below the Recommended Daily Intake, according to USDA’s consumption studies, and vitamin A may also be low. Vitamin D is particularly short in the elderly and in northern climates, and increasingly so as sun-worshipping goes out of vogue. Smoking ‘depletes vitamin C, which appears to be effective in stoking up the immune system.
The role of these vitamins is still controversial. But the RDI for vitamin consumption is rarely met overall, so there is room within current guidelines to develop foods and supplement products that are unlikely to cause overdose of even the fat-soluble vitamins (A and D) that could build up in the body. increased use of vitamin-rich vegetables as ingredients can permit a vitamin-rich label statement on conventional foods.
There were 11 of them in the waiting room. Some as old as a year. All so tiny. Their faces were gray like clouds just before the rain. They hadn’t the strength to lift their arms to discover their fingers.
This is what heart disease looks like when it strikes a baby. That morning, I had been told that Alice, my 5-month-old baby girl, my firstborn after two lost pregnancies, had a hole in her heart. Our pediatrician said we were lucky: The top pediatric cardiologist in the nation, the guy sought out by desperate parents from all over the world, practiced nearby at Babies and Children’s Hospital in New York City’s Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center. He would see us that very afternoon.
At the time, I was the anchor of NBC’s Sunday Today show, and had a morning interview scheduled with the prime minister of Greece. I brought Alice along with me. The prime minister must have thought that strange. I laid her down on a couch near the camera crew, did the interview, and shook his hand. Alice didn’t utter a sound. On the way to die hospital, I stopped at home, put her in her best dress and took her picture. To preserve her at that moment. Her gusto for this living business. Her clear eyes conveying a steady bravery.
Every woman who’s ever lifted and carried and ultimately lugged a baby to term believes she will deliver an absolutely perfect baby. Sure, I knew all the statistics — better, in fact, than most. I am a trustee of the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, which is dedicated to helping families have healthy babies. I knew that no other industrialized nation spends a greater share of its income on health care than we do, but that B other countries have lower rates of infant mortality. I also knew that researchers had already identified more than 3,000 different types of birth defects, that every three and a half minutes a baby is born here with one of them, and that the most common are heart defects. And we still don’t know why.
But none of that would happen on my shift. My husband and I prepared for Alice even before we conceived her, eating right and staying away from caffeine and smoke and alcohol. I took multivitamins with folic acid to prevent neural tube defects. We had great prenatal care, and an Olympian’s zeal for Lamaze training. We were going to be champions at this.
It is a stunning thing when your body betrays you. Labor began in the middle of the night-always does, right? Menstrual cramps to the nth degree. I had die normal reaction. I cleaned out every drawer in the kitchen, sharpened all the pencils in the house, and kept my eye on the clock. By sunrise, there was still no pattern to the contractions, the time between them no closer. So we walked. For nearly nine hours my husband and I walked the length of Manhattan, cruised the Metropolitan Museum of Art, ordered take-out Chinese. By nightfall, we knew we’d waited too long. Before I could get to the hospital, I was in the final stage of labor transition. Transition is a polite term for what it must feel like to catch a downtown express in the small of the back.
It took only seconds for the labor-room monitors to register the crisis. As my gurney was rushed to the operating room, the baby’s heart was fluctuating between warp speed and nothing. It would simply stop. By then the baby was wedged far into the birth canal. A an was no longer an option. Rolling me violently from side to side was the only way to start her heart beating, to keep it beating. The exhaustion and pain were such that I had to fight to stay conscious. I couldn’t help my baby. And at the moment of her birth I couldn’t even hold her. The last thing I remember hearing was the doctors saying. “C’mon baby girl, breathe. Breathe.”
And yet, five hours later, Alice was stabilized, pink, assertive, and starving! Though she looked like she’d gone ten rounds with Mike Tyson, she was, as far as we knew, medically perfect. That baby willed herself to make it. And I wondered at her strength.
But there in the waiting room I was doubtful of mine. I had no idea what this heart defect would mean, or how it would change our lives. But I knew, just knew, it was my fault. I’d been selfish, trying to have a child at the advanced age of 40. Vain in trying to prove my indomitability by going through this kind of high-risk pregnancy while working a bruising 16-hour-a-day schedule.
But I also knew Alice didn’t fit the profile of a kid with a heart problem. She looked too healthy. Too robust. She looked, to all the world, like the Pillsbury Doughboy. At the hospital, the pediatric cardiologist with the unlikely name of Welton Gersony said with a wry smile, “And I suppose you brought her here because of an inability to thrive?”
But when he put his stethoscope to her chest, his face became serious. And my husband and I found ourselves carrying Alice down narrow, dark hospital hallways to a room outfitted with enough electronics to launch a space shuttle. There, on a spare table with Mickey Mouse and his pals dancing from a mobile above, I had to hold her down while they secured electronic leads to her tiny thorax, covered her chest with gel, and pressed the sensor over her heart. The blue light of the monitors turned black, then dissolved into greens and yellows as it circumnavigated Alice’s heart. A spurt of red, like a tiny volcanic eruption, was bursting between the ventricles — the lower pumping chambers.
This echocardiogram confirmed the doctor’s suspicion: Alice had a ventricular septal defect — a hole in her heart. This meant that some oxygenated blood was spurting into her lungs instead of circulating throughout her body-making her heart work harder.
We faced three possibilities: The hole would simply close, as many do by the time the child reaches her second birthday; the hole would remain exactly as it was, requiring only that Alice take antibiotics to prevent infection before visiting the dentist or having surgery; or the hole’s position would begin to interfere with the heart valves. And then we’d be in for a wrenching round of treatments and treacherous surgery.
When it comes to your baby’s health, even the most benign problem is enough to scare the wits out of any parent. Alice’s defect, we learned, was not extreme. Nor was it innocent. It would take vigilance on the part of her doctor, technicians, and nurses. That meant repeated trips to the hospital, repeated hours inside those dark rooms with all that scary equipment. Repeated reminders that she was not like the other kids.
When a child is sick, a good hospital will involve the whole family in the treatment. And it starts with the honest truth. There are some doctors who, out of fear of malpractice or uncertainty about their own judgment, will hedge their prognosis and continue testing endlessly. Dr. Gersony gave it to us straight. He explained the defect in complete clinical, graphic detail. And he said that.. while nothing in this life is 100 percent certain, he felt very strongly that Alice would be just fine.
Amazingly, he placed no restrictions on her. Turns out, even children with serious heart disease are not barred from the everyday activities exclusive to childhood. He said you only get to be a kid once. He told us to treat Alice normally, watch her row. and not to miss any checkups.
There were weeks when I could forget about Alice’s condition altogether. And days when it hung over our household like a sword of Damocles. I did watch her grow, perhaps too vigilantly. Her motor skills were behind. She was crawling on time and walking, but her coordination was awkward. By the time she was 2, the hole should have closed. It hadn’t When she was 2 1/2, her twin sisters were born, and our attention was diverted. But I couldn’t ignore Alice’s toddler chums pumping tricycles, while she remained too unsteady to try. At 3, when her friends were learning the joy of propelling themselves on a swing, Alice still needed to be pushed. And tested. Meanwhile, her echocardiograms looked the same.
By the time her schoolmates in prekindergarten were climbing the monkey bars, Alice had grounded herself, content to draw pictures in the dirt on the playground, not knowing the daily victories that most children — including her little sisters — were taking for granted. These were eminently attainable for her. As far as we knew, she had no physical impairments that would prevent her from soaring as high as other kids. Was her delay something I had imposed by being, inadvertently, overprotective? Or did this caution come from her@ Was there a place deep within her that made her believe she was so different that normal goals were outside her reach? After all, any child who is poked and prodded and forced to focus on what is wrong with her might eventually conclude that she’d done something pretty bad for which she was being punished.
During those years, we became enveloped in the medical system. There is nothing like hanging out in hospitals for making friends. We had arrived, new to this and worried sick, to be surrounded by veterans: Parents of other heart babies who knew the ropes and were willing to talk us through it. Nurses in the neonatal intensive care who genuinely loved these babies. Doctors who made time to talk, joke, or ask if we’d help someone else. As we became part of this Wraparound support network, I was able to watch some highly complex, hair-raising surgical procedures. I sat with the parents, rocked babies entubated in the intensive care unit. And from the kids who got better and came back to visit I received enough Crayola masterpieces to paper ten refrigerators. The children taught me something terribly important: that new life will conquer anything it can to survive. Babies don’t decide to live. They simply assume it. And in a fight for life they can be tougher than all of us.
When Alice was 5 years, 1 month, and 3 days old, we went back into what we’d come to call the echo-chamber. By now she was a pro at this. She lay there, looking into my eyes, as we sang in harmony. it was her favorite, “Edelweiss.” When the monitor resolved into its primary-colored image of the heart, the technician started shouting at radiologists and nurses and catheterization specialists to get in there fast. I’m surprised the janitor didn’t come running. Dr. Gersony did. There on the screen was a membrane separating the ventricles so strong and firm it looked like it would stand for eternity. The hole had closed of its own volition. Amidst the laughter and general din, Alice said, “You mean my heart isn’t broken?” And the tech said, No, but you’ll break a few.”
The effect was as though someone had lifted a rock off our chests. Alice took off. She went back to school and climbed the monkey bars. To the very top. We got her a big-girl bike with training wheels. But it took my brother, the subversive, to sneak into the garage and take off the trainers. I gave in, propped her on the seat, hollered something helpful like, “Peddle like crazy,” and gave her a shove. And I watched her, knees sticking out a little too far, wobbling headlong toward the first grade. Grateful that when she takes a tumble, she has the courage to get back up. Grateful that as we wobble toward the next century, this is what heart disease can look like.
You may already know that heart disease, or atherosclerosis, is the leading cause of death in the United States of the age 65 or older population. But did you know it is also now one of the leading causes of death after spinal cord injury (SCI)? This makes sense when you realize survival after a SCI is now much better than in the past because urinary tract and respiratory problems can be treated successfully.
An important goal toward reducing the risk of heart disease is to increase HDL, “good” cholesterol, and lower intake of “normal” cholesterol. Spinal cord injured individuals have a lower “good” cholesterol, HDL, than able-bodied individuals. HDLs are considered good because they carry cholesterol away from the arteries and back to the liver. Therefore just keeping track of body weight and total cholesterol is not enough. If you have low “normal” total cholesterol ([less than]200) but have a lower “good” cholesterol level ([less than]35), the risk for heart disease still exists.
Atherosclerosis is a condition that leads to hardening of the larger arteries which lead to the heart or the brain. Blocking of these arteries leads to heart attack or stroke. The hardening process develops gradually and is influenced by many different factors including high blood pressure, obesity, inactivity, smoking, family history of high cholesterol and diet. Family history can not be altered. Inactivity and high blood pressure may or may not be controllable. The other risk factors – smoking, weight and diet – can be reckoned with. Let’s focus on weight and diet.
The American Heart Association has developed dietary guidelines that are recommended to help lower one’s risk for heart disease.
1. Total calories should be sufficient to maintain ideal body weight. It is recommended that your ideal body weight and recommended calorie intake be discussed with your doctor or a registered dietician. Your ideal body weight may be 5 – 15% below that recommended for the able-bodied population. Height, weight, age, sex, activity, and medical conditions all need to be considered. Until you do that, you can start reading labels and record your calorie intake for three days. This will give you your current average. If your average intake is high (2100 – 2500 a day or more), and you are overweight, cutting back to 1800 or 2000 will be a good first step. Do not go below 1400 calories until you check with your doctor!
2. Of your total calories, only 30% of them should come from fat. Let’s say your calorie intake should be approximately 1800 a day; your fat intake can be 30% of this or 600 calories. Divide 600 by 9 to get the number of fat grams this equals. In this example, 66 grams of fat is the limit. This may sound like plenty, but one fast food meal can easily use up your daily allowance. Fast food chains should have nutrient content pamphlets available. Just ask!
3. Saturated fat intake should only be 1/3 of your total fat intake. If your fat goal is 66 grams a day you are limited to 22 grams of saturated fat. Experts now say that monitoring saturated fat intake is more important than watching total cholesterol intake in fighting heart disease. Sources of saturated fat include whole milk, cheese, butter, coconut oil and palm oil.
Long term compliance is the goal and best accomplished with slower, gradual lifestyle changes. For many it is easier to tackle the first two guidelines and then work toward achieving the next two.
Besides watching your diet, decreasing alcohol intake, quitting smoking, losing weight, and exercising if possible, are ways to increase the HDL and lower your risk for heart disease.
Remember, your cholesterol level and/or weight did not rise overnight, so don’t expect overnight results with this either. Progress can be slow. Record your weight and lab values on a table to see results over time.
4. Cholesterol intake should not exceed 300 mgs. per day. Cholesterol comes from animal products such as egg yolks, meat (especially organ meat) milk, cheese, and butter. This number is the same for everyone; it does not depend on caloric needs.
Keeping tabs on these numbers is easy. The new food labels spell out the grams of fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol for you. You just need to note the serving size and adjust if you are eating more than this.
What you can do about it -
* watch your diet,
* decrease alcohol intake,
* quit smoking,
* lose weight